Imagine a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. What is the cost?
The replacement it makes will decide the final answer.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology system, $12,000 might be money well spent. If a company of seven could have the same evidence in two hours per month, the cost will be different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t start by asking which platform offers the most features. Ask what those features will save your company in actual time and energy.
Automation has an economic break-even At this
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance will change as the company expands. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company with hundreds of employees, many cloud environments, numerous applications, and frequent access changes. Manually collecting evidence could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can justly justify the expense.
Imagine a business with 10 people preparing to undergo the initial SOC 2. audit. It might have a small infrastructure, and the evidence collection could be managed with no significant automation.
Vanta pricing is based upon this difference. While an advanced platform could have many features, they are only valuable when the organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture, not Just Brands
A search for Vanta Vs. Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is essential to look at the services, features, contracts and quotes of both platforms. Both are established compliance platforms that focus on automation and integrations.
There’s a second decision you need to take. Do you want a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same pattern.
Many Vanta competitors are in the same class that concentrates on automation. On the market, there are platforms with less cluttered designs which focus more on the organization of systems rather as opposed to connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the second group. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace and allows for editing of guidelines for policy and evidence. Auditors are able to review the documents submitted using a read-only interface.
It doesn’t set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers can upload their own evidence.
The System Access consideration in the Decision
The removal of integrations comes with a clear disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
This removes the requirement to integrate and the implementation of compliance is not dependent on any connection to the operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. The relevant question is which option is most appropriate for your business.
CertAssist is aimed at teams that comprise between five and 200 people and publishes its pricing rather than requiring a sales conversation to obtain the beginning price. The price for its launch is $225 per month as opposed to the regular cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
What a startup with 10 employees requires today may not be the same when you have 100 or even 500 employees.
A simple platform could make sense if compliance remains easy. As employees, systems, frameworks, and evidence requirements expand, the economics may eventually favor greater automation. Allow complexity to take the lead when you purchase compliance technology.
Don’t buy fifty integrations just because they look impressive on a comparison chart. They should be paid for only if the cost to do the work manually is greater.